Automated bug fixing with engineering boundaries.
Automate the repetitive repair trail while preserving review, project policy and evidence.
What should automatic bug fixing automate?
Automatic bug fixing should reduce the manual work of gathering context, reproducing failures, locating affected code, preparing a focused patch and selecting relevant checks. It should not silently alter production systems or declare success because code compiled.
Turn reports and failures into repair work
Remedy structures both user-reported and machine-detected incidents. Evidence is sanitised, correlated with repository and deployment state, and transformed into a bounded repair task rather than passed through as untrusted instructions.
Automatic does not mean uncontrolled
A project can require named tests, a clean build, a repair branch, pull or merge request review and an explicit deployment approval. A fix reaches verified status only when configured post-deployment checks demonstrate that the original failure has cleared.
Frequently asked questions
Will Remedy push directly to production?
Deployment behaviour is governed by customer policy. Remedy is designed to support reviewable branches and approval before production change.
What kinds of bugs can begin automatically?
Planned detection paths include configured application exceptions, API assertion failures, unhealthy services, container failures and relevant connected telemetry.
From bug report to verified fix.
See how Remedy connects evidence, diagnosis, repair, deterministic checks and production verification.
Explore the complete workflow →
Remedy